PDF Download The Great Divide: Why Liberals and Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, by William D. Gairdner
Just how is to make certain that this The Great Divide: Why Liberals And Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, By William D. Gairdner will not presented in your bookshelves? This is a soft documents publication The Great Divide: Why Liberals And Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, By William D. Gairdner, so you could download The Great Divide: Why Liberals And Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, By William D. Gairdner by buying to get the soft documents. It will certainly alleviate you to read it every single time you require. When you really feel lazy to move the published book from home to office to some location, this soft data will reduce you not to do that. Because you can only conserve the data in your computer unit and also device. So, it enables you read it almost everywhere you have readiness to check out The Great Divide: Why Liberals And Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, By William D. Gairdner
The Great Divide: Why Liberals and Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, by William D. Gairdner
PDF Download The Great Divide: Why Liberals and Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, by William D. Gairdner
The Great Divide: Why Liberals And Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, By William D. Gairdner When composing can alter your life, when writing can enhance you by providing much cash, why do not you try it? Are you still really baffled of where getting the ideas? Do you still have no concept with what you are visiting compose? Now, you will need reading The Great Divide: Why Liberals And Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, By William D. Gairdner A great writer is a good reader at once. You could define how you create depending upon what books to review. This The Great Divide: Why Liberals And Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, By William D. Gairdner could aid you to fix the issue. It can be one of the best sources to establish your composing skill.
If you get the printed book The Great Divide: Why Liberals And Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, By William D. Gairdner in on-line book store, you could additionally find the exact same issue. So, you must relocate establishment to store The Great Divide: Why Liberals And Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, By William D. Gairdner and look for the offered there. However, it will not occur below. The book The Great Divide: Why Liberals And Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, By William D. Gairdner that we will certainly provide right here is the soft documents principle. This is what make you could easily find and get this The Great Divide: Why Liberals And Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, By William D. Gairdner by reading this site. We offer you The Great Divide: Why Liberals And Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, By William D. Gairdner the most effective product, always and also consistently.
Never ever doubt with our offer, since we will always offer exactly what you require. As like this updated book The Great Divide: Why Liberals And Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, By William D. Gairdner, you may not discover in the various other area. Yet here, it's quite simple. Merely click as well as download, you could possess the The Great Divide: Why Liberals And Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, By William D. Gairdner When simpleness will ease your life, why should take the complicated one? You can acquire the soft data of guide The Great Divide: Why Liberals And Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, By William D. Gairdner here and also be member of us. Besides this book The Great Divide: Why Liberals And Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, By William D. Gairdner, you could likewise discover hundreds listings of guides from several resources, collections, publishers, as well as writers in worldwide.
By clicking the link that we offer, you could take guide The Great Divide: Why Liberals And Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, By William D. Gairdner flawlessly. Hook up to web, download, and also save to your gadget. What else to ask? Checking out can be so simple when you have the soft file of this The Great Divide: Why Liberals And Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, By William D. Gairdner in your device. You could also copy the documents The Great Divide: Why Liberals And Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, By William D. Gairdner to your workplace computer system or in your home or even in your laptop computer. Just share this excellent news to others. Recommend them to see this page as well as get their hunted for publications The Great Divide: Why Liberals And Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, By William D. Gairdner.
The theme of The Great Divide is that the populations of the democratic world, from Boston to Berlin, Vancouver to Venice, are becoming increasingly divided from within, due to a growing ideological incompatibility between modern liberalism and conservatism. This is partly due to a complex mutation in the concept of liberal democracy itself, and the resulting divide is now so wide that those holding to either philosophy on a whole range of topics: on democracy, on reason, on abortion, on human nature, on homosexuality and gay marriage, on freedom, on the role of courts … and much more, can barely speak with each other without outrage (the favorite emotional response from all sides). Clearly, civil conversation at the surface has been failing -- and that could mean democracy is failing.
This book is an effort to deepen the conversation. It is written for the non-specialist, and aims to reveal the less obvious underlying ideological forces and misconceptions that cause the conflict and outrage at the surface -- not with any expectation the clash of values will evaporate, but rather that a deeper understanding will generate a more intelligent and civil conversation.
As an aid to understanding, the book contains a handful of Tables directly comparing modern liberal and conservative views across a range of fundamental moral and political “issues” so that curious readers can answer the book’s main question: “Where Do You Stand?” An interesting result in testing this exercise has been the number of people who find they “think” one way, but “live” another.
- Sales Rank: #882640 in Books
- Brand: Gairdner, William D.
- Published on: 2015-02-17
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 1.30" h x 6.10" w x 9.10" l, .0 pounds
- Binding: Hardcover
- 280 pages
About the Author
William D. Gairdner, PhD, has had a busy life as an athlete, an academic, a businessman, and latterly, as a successful author. He is presently retired and lives near Toronto, Canada.
As a young athlete, Bill competed in the decathlon at the 1963 Pan-Am Games in Brazil (silver medal), and at the Olympic Games in Tokyo in 1964 (11th place), and then in two Commonwealth Games in the 400 metre hurdles event (6th place both times)
After earning a number of higher degrees, including a Doctorate in Literature and Philosophy from Stanford University (1970), he taught at York University in Toronto for several years, and then decided to pursue a career in business, from which he retired in 1988 to devote his time to writing.
Beginning in 1990, he produced a string of bestselling books in quick succession, including The Trouble with Canada (# 1 in Canada in 1990), and The War Against The Family. He was then the managing editor of Canada’s Founding Debates - now an historical landmark. On the heels of that he published The Trouble with Democracy, and also The Book of Absolutes. His last book was The Trouble with Canada … Still! – an overview of the regime-change in Canada over the past twenty years that was released in 2010 and sold out in three months.
Most helpful customer reviews
24 of 26 people found the following review helpful.
Liberal Democratic Servitude
By H. Price
Hesiod measured the distance ‘twixt Heaven and Hell as “a full eighteen days’ journey as the bronze anvil falls”. Nothing compared to the ideological infinity that separates today’s liberals and conservatives. That, in part, is the thesis of William Gairdner’s latest book, The Great Divide: Why Liberals and Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree.
Gairdner is the prolific author of a dozen titles, including The War Against the Family, The Trouble with Canada, The Trouble with Democracy, The Book of Absolutes, and The Trouble with Canada…Still: heretical tomes which, notwithstanding the liberal orthodoxy of our age, and the unpromising economies of modern scholarly book-publishing, managed to become bestsellers. The new book is in a sense Gairdner’s summa. Dealing less with topical controversies and policies than the perennial philosophical and moral questions that underlie and inform them (the nature of man, reason, freedom, equality and inequality, and so on, each treated in a separate chapter), The Great Divide is a lucidly reasoned taxonomy of conflicting liberal and conservative ideas. It is certain to be of invaluable use for generations of readers to come, whether to serious students of political philosophy, or ordinary citizens who simply like to contend in the arena of ideas, but would prefer to understand more deeply what they are contending about.
As Gairdner observes, our modern Western democracies “from Vancouver to Venice” have triumphed over the external enemies of fascism and communism only to succumb to a protracted civil war between two opposite and irreconcilable world-views. Liberals and conservatives are currently estranged across so vast and unbridgeable a chasm that, even when they are speaking to one another, they are obliged to shout at the top of their lungs, and still can’t make themselves understood.
While he harbours no illusions that the divide will ever be healed, Gairdner exhorts both sides to examine the foundational principles of their own, and their opponents’, arguments, if the emotional volume of the debate is to be turned down, and a resumption of rational discourse made possible again. (Contemporary observers may be forgiven for not knowing that the talking points of political partisans are rooted in intellectual soil. Gairdner shows that they are.)
The first part of his book traces the evolution (or revolution, in the case of liberalism) of the two schools of thought from their Enlightenment origins. What becomes immediately clear is that the classical liberalism of a Voltaire or Locke has rather more in common with the conservatism of Hume and Burke (and with that of today’s benighted “reactionaries”) than it does with its current liberal namesake.
From the birth of democracy in both the United States and Canada to as recently as the beginning of the New Deal, liberals and conservatives have agreed on most things, e.g.: that the preservation of human liberty, which is the principal promise and burden of liberal democracy, can only be accomplished through the restraint of the arbitrary, monopolistic power of the State; that traditional, organic, empirically proven moral norms, customs, institutions, and voluntary associations (family, marriage, church, the free market, local organizations and clubs) are the bedrock of civil society, (and having been formed by voluntary consent, they are the repositories of a spontaneous moral authority in the commonwealth of free men); that a diversity of economic and social conditions is the inevitable and just consequence of both the existential diversity of human character and effort and the ancient principle of equality before the law; that the fault (or advantage) lies in ourselves, not in our stars (whether economic, social, or other “root cause”); and that egalitarianism (as contemporary liberalism defines and evangelizes it) is a direct repudiation of all of the above.
Since then, classical liberalism (and liberal democracy) have mutated into something like parodies of their original selves. While “we still use the flattering term liberal democracy to describe our political systems”, the average ratepayer is now a bondsman of the Pharaonic State for almost half of every working year (until his manumission, that is, on tax freedom day). In today’s Western democracies, the machinery of government is more coercive, more tentacular, and more rapacious--while the residual social and economic liberties of private citizens are fewer, smaller, and more precarious--than practically ever before in history, including under the absolute monarchies whose oppressive yokes the liberals of the eighteenth century thought they had once and for all cast off.
Gairdner traces the origins of this wholesale surrender of liberal principles to nineteenth-century socialist theorists, who began to ascribe inequalities to uncontrollable (“unfair”, as we would say today) external causes, and argued that the establishment of universal economic and social equality was the raison d’etre of the beneficent State. But since free individuals, relying upon their own varying talents, exercising their own spontaneous choices, and expressing their own natural differences, will inevitably become “unequal”, socialists have always resorted to the brute leveling force of government (taking from some and giving to others) to reify their egalitarian dreams. Modern democracies have thus “abandon[ed] their previous emphasis on freedom for all, under laws the same for all”, to adopt the egalitarian monstrosity of “equality for all, under unequal laws”. With the progressive income tax, personal and corporate subsidies for some (but not others), affirmative action (for some but not others), and human rights for all (except, e.g., Christian refuseniks of abortion and homosexuality), the foundational principle of the rule of law--impartial and identical treatment of all citizens, irrespective of person--has been peremptorily overturned. After the medieval divine right of kings, after twentieth-century totalitarianism, the modern liberal welfare state has managed to re-enshrine the pre-civilized ethos that might, in the execution of a ruler’s caprice, makes right.
Gairdner postulates that liberty-loving citizens accepted this new statist tyranny as a Faustian bargain: they surrendered their ancient public and political liberties (including their original democratic rights to freedom of speech and religious expression) in exchange for a more or less unlimited freedom of will within a newly-created zone of purely personal and private morality, having to do principally with the modern fetish of sex. Their governments bribed them, that is, with accommodating divorce laws; universally accessible contraception and abortion (further “liberating” them in the quest for sexual “self-realization”); homosexual rights; transgender rights; gay marriage, and so on--all of which were made available “to all equally in the name of freedom”. While the State has thus abdicated its traditional interest in this newly immunized, irreducibly “private” moral sphere, it has created a “vast public realm funded by massively increased taxation and permanent public debt”, insinuating itself into every corner of formerly autonomous human activity (business, trade, education, child care, health care, elder care, science, the arts), and setting itself up as the universal “benefactor, regulator, and protector” of mankind.
The result has been that conjunctio oppositorum that Gairdner calls “libertarian socialism”, and along with it, the contemporary “tripartite state”, in which one-third of the population work to create wealth, one-third work for government, and the final third live off the benefits distributed to them by the second, having confiscated them from the first. This, as Gairdner suggests, is a self-perpetuating Ponzi scheme, since in majoritarian democracies the latter two sectors will always out-vote the former. No less repugnantly, the tripartite state has created a miasmal swamp of moral confusion, with depredatory, power-hungry governments claiming credit for compassion and generosity, and demagogically inciting their dependents to condemn the “greed” of the productive minority on which they both parasitically batten.
In two illuminating chapters (“On Conservatism” and “The Forces at Work”), Gairdner examines the traditional social structures and customs beyond which the modern welfare state has so heroically progressed. Unlike liberals, conservatives have always tended to accept the imperfections of life as a product of the fundamental imperfectability of human nature; (as the late Joe Sobran has described it, their defining mood is one of gratitude, rather than gnawing discontent). As such, conservatives prefer the civilizational wisdom accumulated by long experience (“the best that has been said and done by our progenitors”) to the abstract concepts and theories upon which revolutionary liberals have founded their successive codes, declarations, and charters for the creation a perfect society of scrupulously “New Men” (which have more often resulted in totalitarian hells than the promised heavens on earth). For the renovation of man’s fallen nature, conservatives have relied instead on empirically tested, time-honoured institutions, customs, and norms (the “formative vehicle[s] of our human second nature”), which have evolved and been refined over the course of an immemorial civilizing process. As “natural and organic product[s] of historical experience”, these traditional social arrangements are in fact “prior in existence and importance” both to individuals and the State. Having arisen “from the ground up”, by mutual cooperation and consent, they have an inherent moral authority, which is a direct affront to the coercive power of the imperial State. And as Gairdner points out, their existential priority wholly invalidates the vaunted liberal “social contract theory” of government: “because…in order for a contract creating civil society to come into being, an entire structure of civility, law, and custom protecting and policing such a contract--a functioning society--would already have to be in place”.
But the main function of civil society, and the private voluntary associations that are its organizing units, is “to welcome and encourage the creation of inequalities in the form of exclusive group privileges, benefits, and duties that are shared by group members only”. For that reason, they have lain directly athwart the path of the egalitarian bulldozer. The reader can think of any number of recent examples, from the assaults on Christian educational institutions, charitable organizations, or the Boy Scouts, to the fiat by which the State has conferred, in the name of equal rights, the privileges of traditional marriage upon same-sex couples, who are disqualified by definition.
The grand project of egalitarian liberal democracy, then, is to declare all formerly exclusive privileges a “right for all”, to annul all qualifying distinctions, and thus, as universal Benefactor, to “transfer to itself the deep loyalties and gratitude generated by the civil social-bonding process”. The State usurps these allegiances by providing what Gairdner calls “substitute caring”, the myriad social programs, community facilities, subsidies for the arts, and so on, which it so generously offers at the expense of every taxpayer, including those who will never use them. A thriving pluralist civil society is thereby converted into what politicians proudly call our “one national family”. Meanwhile, the dissolution of natural social bonds, which have always been the nurseries of human liberty in flourishing societies, removes the few remaining “real-world barriers to state coercion”.
In these and many other ways, Gairdner traces the descent of liberty and civil society into modern liberal democratic servitude. A series of eight chapters on some of the fundamental philosophical questions on which liberals and conservatives disagree (human nature, the limits of reason, freedom, will, democracy, equality and inequality, morality and self, God and religion) constitute the bulk of his book; but it is impossible, within the scope of a review, to do justice to the complexity and breadth of Gairdner’s analysis of the liberal-conservative divide on these themes. By way of summary, at the end of each chapter, Gairdner appends a handy little comparative table, through which the reader can determine where he stands on the question (and whether he and his new bride will still be on speaking terms in a couple of years).
The one fault of Gairdner’s work is also its virtue. Though he makes no effort to hide his conservatism, he strives throughout to rise above polemics and referee the debate from a posture of neutrality (to which one only wishes modern governments would return). And he succeeds too well. Few liberals, it seems to me, could have written this book. Since the Sixties, the zealous avidity with which liberals have striven to abominate traditional institutions and norms has far outstripped the disorganized instincts of conservatives to preserve them. Witness the pusillanimous capitulation to President Obama by a recently triumphant majority of Republicans in Congress, desperate not to be accused of imposing “gridlock”, where gridlock, as defined by liberals, is what happens when there’s a Democrat in the White House; (when the President is a Republican, gridlock is the wisely intended consequence of the Founders’ “prudent separation of powers”).
And though Gairdner hopes that an examination of first principles will help to turn the volume down, very early in the book he mentions “political correctness”, whose purpose is to turn the volume off. Political correctness is a liberal project, enforced by all of the totalitarian agencies of the modern egalitarian State about which Gairdner writes. Under its shadow, the problem is not that the debate has become shrill, but that it has become silent.
Finally, as Gairdner demonstrates (though one wishes he had said so explicitly), the Great Divide can hardly be laid at the feet of conservatives. It is liberalism that has decamped to the wildest fringes of the ideological topocosm. And yet it’s liberals who reflexively vilify conservatives as “right wing ideological extremists”. Which is rather on the order of calling one’s relatives back home in Pennsylvania “eastern extremists”, after setting off with one’s stoner buddies to Haight-Ashbury.
But these are quibbles. Gairdner’s analyses of the political quarrels between liberals and conservatives, and the way in which they erupt from subterranean fault-lines of which neither may be fully conscious, are always penetrating and often brilliant in their originality. The style throughout is at once accessible, elegant, and revelatory: replete, that is, with the ironies, paradoxes, and aphoristic strokes for which Gairdner is widely celebrated. For both liberals and conservatives who wish to think their arguments down to their roots, there is probably no better guide than The Great Divide.
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful.
Five Stars
By Francis Buckley
Are you at heart a liberal or a conservative. If you're not sure, this very learned (and yet highly accessible) book will help you sort yourself out. Gairdner takes the subject far deeper than nearly every other writer on the subject, and my only reservation is the very prudential and tactical one that members of a minority party need to look for allies more than for opponents. There are a good many non-religious conservatives (Hume, George Will), as well as conservative libertarians (Barry Goldwater), and even gay conservatives (Bruce Bawer). Conservative purity is a useful heurtistic, if it's employed to look for allies, more than for enemies.
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful.
I thoroughly enjoyed learning about the history and development of these philosophies ...
By Christopher Ott
Gairdner delves below the surface of politics into the world of modern-liberal/conservative philosophy, utilizing simple and effective articulation of complex ideas.Because of Gairdner's tempered focus-level, once learned, you can apply these concepts well beyond the contentious topics covered in Part 4.
I thoroughly enjoyed learning about the history and development of these philosophies from the perfect focus-point. Too often names like "Hume" and "Mills" appear in a more specialized book and it must be assumed that the reader either knows those thinkers or perhaps it isn't not imperative that they do.
Gairdner deploys a ground-up-effort that goes down easy and will enhance the reader's understanding of their world below the veil of politics.
The Great Divide: Why Liberals and Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, by William D. Gairdner PDF
The Great Divide: Why Liberals and Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, by William D. Gairdner EPub
The Great Divide: Why Liberals and Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, by William D. Gairdner Doc
The Great Divide: Why Liberals and Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, by William D. Gairdner iBooks
The Great Divide: Why Liberals and Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, by William D. Gairdner rtf
The Great Divide: Why Liberals and Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, by William D. Gairdner Mobipocket
The Great Divide: Why Liberals and Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree, by William D. Gairdner Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar